Average Bench: 91.9% (20th of 104)

Based on 51 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3600C17-4GTZ 2x4GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB averaged just 8.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 35.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB is 59.6%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 20.2GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.2ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 51 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.3 MC Read 35.1 47.1
14.5 MC Write 36 49
12.1 MC Mixed 28.2 37.1
94.6% 33.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.9 SC Read 20.2 26.6
14.2 SC Write 34.8 47
12.7 SC Mixed 26.6 35.1
77.7% 27.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
45.4 Latency 68.2 105
58.6% 68.2 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 33.2
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 33
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 46.1
87% 46.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 32.2
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 33.6
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 45.8
87% 45.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 32.9
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 28.2
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 34.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 27.1
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 34
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 29.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 33.8
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
51 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 8,750,778 RAM Kits tested.

 Prices

Approx. $108 @ launch in Nov '15
NeweggUS $13011 hrs
Send price feedback
Typical Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB Builds (Compare 533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,259

Popular Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x4GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2018 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price per GB.

 Comments

104 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $89Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $138
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $911SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback