Average Bench: 79.5% (60th of 115)

Based on 5,417 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G 2x16GB

Good average bench

The Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB averaged 20.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 31GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 30.4GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB is 21.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.5GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 82ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,417 samples)
Min Avg Max
22.4 MC Read 29 32.2
25.8 MC Write 31 33.2
22.5 MC Mixed 25.8 28.7
81.8% 28.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.7 SC Read 16.5 22.6
19.1 SC Write 30.4 35
14.8 SC Mixed 23.2 27.6
66.8% 23.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.7 Latency 82 132
48.8% 82 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 25
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 18.4
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 25.4
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
5,417 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,000,311 RAM Kits tested

Typical HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9560 - $1,300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,300

Popular HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback