Average Bench: 76.1% (68th of 115)

Based on 7,414 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR 4x8GB

Good average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB averaged 23.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 28.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 28GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB is 39.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.1GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 7,414 samples)
Min Avg Max
22.1 MC Read 28.5 39.7
16.7 MC Write 28 42.8
20.5 MC Mixed 25.3 35
78% 27.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.6 SC Read 18.1 25.1
15.6 SC Write 26.3 34.5
16.5 SC Mixed 23.1 28.7
64.3% 22.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
63.3 Latency 79.7 110
50.2% 79.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 23.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 23.9
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 27.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 20.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
7,414 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,002,266 RAM Kits tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $140 @ launch in Sep '15
AmazonUS $18223 months
Send price feedback
Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB Builds (Compare 4,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $743

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback