Average Bench: 92% (18th of 105)

Based on 1,641 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3400C16-8GTZ 2x8GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB averaged just 7.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 35.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 35.3GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB is 55.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19.8GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 62.1ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,641 samples)
Min Avg Max
21.5 MC Read 33.9 43.3
21.3 MC Write 35.3 45.3
18.3 MC Mixed 29.1 38
93.7% 32.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.5 SC Read 19.8 25.5
19 SC Write 35.8 48.5
15.1 SC Mixed 27.1 34.3
78.7% 27.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.4 Latency 62.1 86.2
64.4% 62.1 ns
User Benchmarks Bench Multi core Single core Latency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 34.6
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 33.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 38.3
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 35.8
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 28
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 33.6
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 32.6
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 48
83% 48 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 33.7
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 33.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 37.3
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 29.3
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 35.2
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
1,641 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 10,460,233 RAM Kits tested.

Typical Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 7,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $136

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $937

Popular Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2018 RAM Rankings.

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

105 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $145SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $155SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback