| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME B360M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180319 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 09 '18 at 21:49 |
| Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.6%
Very good
|
81% 144 Pts
|
54% 409 Pts
|
28% 445 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54%
Above average
|
52% 61.7 fps
|
58% 69.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 505 505 505 376 287 MB/s
|
||||
|
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB
174GB free
Firmware: R0302A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 18 21 19 24 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
32% 152 MB/s
|
61% 15.2 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
118GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 57 57 56 55 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
36% 49.6 MB/s
|
113% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
39.5%
Below average
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME B360M-A Builds (Compare 7,504 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-A - $495
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,536x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 1,317x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 1,278x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 485x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 444x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 426x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $1,023 |