Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 157 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 321 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 340 321 306 356 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 365 Write 398 Mixed 334 SusWrite 329 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 30.9 108% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 333 248% 329 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.1% Average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 5.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.3 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	492x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	296x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	19x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16