MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A59
MotherboardMSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 14:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 514
62% 479 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 58.9
53% 62.9 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 52.1
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 424 302 301 302 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 1,380
Mixed 666
SusWrite 465
243% 1,098 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 62.6
246% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 690
675% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 234%
Great: 236%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 97 49 21 18 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 401
Write 130
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 55.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 10.6
33% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 17.7
15% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31%
Great: 56%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
237GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 61
SusWrite 94.1
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
567GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 69
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
150GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 171 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 147
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 170
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 32.3
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 27.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 100%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A59) - $146

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback