Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160128
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '18 at 01:15
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 88.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 221 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 739 71% 583 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.8% Very good	Lighting 94.7 Reflection 90.7 Parallax 89 77% 91.5 fps	MRender 87.2 Gravity 91.8 Splatting 80.1 70% 86.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 389 334 321 321 325 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 479 Mixed 382 SusWrite 355 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 51.7 181% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 185GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 457 400 380 336 321 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 446 Mixed 381 SusWrite 390 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 49.7 167% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 215GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 56.5 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 56.5 42% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $532

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16