PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP xw4600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA0h |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080828 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 06:12 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
23.1%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 9.3 59 85 125 130 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
100GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 85 81 105 115 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
407GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 59 56 61 65 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 24x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 21x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples | 12x |
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $130 |