Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 09 '18 at 21:57
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 138
60% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 321
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 13.2
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 100 98 40 57 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 401
Write 230
Mixed 306
SusWrite 78
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 1.2
64% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 82
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 14.3
20% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 137 136 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 135
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 128 128 132 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 129
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
10GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 90 92 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 93.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 91
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Adata 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback