PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120809 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 10 '18 at 18:32 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.2
|
5.5%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 36 48 23 22 20 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
5GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 46 61 63 54 70 MB/s
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
473GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 52 65 73 56 77 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
4GB free
Firmware: 8.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 20 22 24 19 25 MB/s
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 34x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 32x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 15x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 8x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $446 |