Zoostorm 7200-5381A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5381A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B350-PLUS
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 19:24
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 197
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 722
66% 553 Pts
64-Core 1090
68% 1090 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 76.3
0% 47.3 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 52.6
46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 194 170 173 178 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 671
Mixed 343
SusWrite 186
112% 504 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 53.5
184% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 77.6
197% 418 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 127%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 138 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 140
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 84%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
328GB free
Firmware: JA0OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 81.1
Write 79.9
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 74.4
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
779GB free
Firmware: MX6OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 144 147 146 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 144
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 146
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB
89GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 59.6
Write 55.6
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 56.7
66% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback