Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 12:54
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 110
58% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 294
32% 255 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 77.2
53% 66.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 73.5
51% 61.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 306 300 298 302 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 418
Write 317
Mixed 283
SusWrite 299
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 34.5
118% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 142
126% 187 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
210GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 391 385 378 389 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 364
Write 401
Mixed 347
SusWrite 374
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 36
122% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.7
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 50.7
42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
101GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 76.5
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback