Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A64
Motherboard	MSI H270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A64) (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '18 at 19:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 190 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 309 37% 285 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.1% Very good	Lighting 85 Reflection 123 Parallax 107 69% 105 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 126 Splatting 101 81% 97.2 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 193GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 159 109 69 67 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 359 Write 93.6 Mixed 184 SusWrite 96.4 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 16.3 68% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 197 171% 252 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 68 55 45 45 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 97.8 Write 67.5 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 51 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 70%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 70 80 81 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 158 Write 123 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 84.3 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 2x4GB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	75.4% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 24.1 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 22.4 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	11x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $457

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16