ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20AWS1EH00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20AWS1EH00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20AWS1EH00
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131218
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '15 at 12:05
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 91.9 2-Core 174 61% 133 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 261 35% 262 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 220E) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3272 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Lighting 5.33 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 6.06 4% 6.09 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 8.04 4% 5.11 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD512HAGM-000L1 512GB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4000 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 362 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 86 86 158 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 12480 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 30 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 3768719 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (EC) Unknown 99 99 72 (ED) Unknown 99 99 158 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	62.6% Good	Read 496 Write 104 Mixed 119 52% 240 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 14.1 93% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 24.2 68% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 80%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB 1,043 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 113 Write 122 Mixed 113 151% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 3.78 4K Mixed 0.51 148% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB 4,921 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 70GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 37.1 Mixed 36.4 48% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.34 70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 49%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	6.1% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 6.57 Mixed 8.36 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.62 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.004 25% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.1% Great: 7%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 20AWS1EH00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20AWS1EH00

CPU
Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $149Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	1x
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 49%, 2,894 samples	1x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $413

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback