Asrock X79 Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140429
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '16 at 18:56
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 637 57% 480 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3683) CLim: 1655 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.70 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 78 67% 80.2 fps	MRender 80.7 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 64.2 59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 75GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1063 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 253 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 49 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1944429843	69.7% Good	Read 495 Write 276 Mixed 277 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 16.3 103% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 16.1 28% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 114%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1652 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 479 (B1) Unknown 90 90 49 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 43 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13319889683
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49 9,420 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 258GB free Firmware: MS1OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896829622 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 941 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1453 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 433 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 943 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 943 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 197569806369 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 190 Mixed 164 134% 179 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.22 96% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 91GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 87 (03) Spinup time 110 110 17193566416 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3637 (05) Reallocated sector count 86 86 421 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14919 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2996 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 7110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7587 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 206159413280 (C4) Reallocation count 78 78 526 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	71.8% Very good	Read 124 Write 126 Mixed 124 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.17 74% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 4x8GB 612 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 36 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme3

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	43x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	7x

SSD
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	7x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	5x
Chronos 120GBMushkin $70Bench 68%, 862 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	5x
M378B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 87%, 109 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 143% - Outstanding

Total price: $132

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16