Asus StrikerExtreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus StrikerExtreme  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20070726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '15 at 08:17
Run Duration1328 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 74.7
25% 56 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 137
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1014.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 34
Parallax 45.3
29% 38.5 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 39
29% 34.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gb0500c8 046 500GB
264GB free
Firmware: HPG6 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.5
Mixed 94.1
72% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.27
71% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 57%
Nvidia MIRROR 69.24G 74GB
40GB free (System drive)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.9% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 66.3
Mixed 62
48% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.62
139% 1.09 MB/s
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 9360
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Read 0.96
Write 0.78
Mixed 0.87
1% 0.87 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.08
5% 0.21 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 2%
Typical StrikerExtreme Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus StrikerExtreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $57
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback