Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161013
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '17 at 06:14
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 151 60% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 565 51% 429 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 19.7 18% 19.3 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 23 Splatting 16.4 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB 1,828 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 22 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 39 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 341 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65538 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 112	52.7% Above average	Read 263 Write 259 Mixed 265 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 11.8 66% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 11.6 50% 110 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 465GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 158 137 667377 (03) Spinup time 126 120 6658 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5285 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17646 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3092 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 670 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 138 138 186280 (C2) HDA temperature 107 86 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 193 28 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 161 3	56.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 96.2 Mixed 97.1 74% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.22 80% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 157GB free Firmware: MX1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 88005715 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2283 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 16 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 17776392319 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2231 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 81606148933 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 55 638910502 (C2) HDA temperature 38 45 55834574886 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 30 88005715 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	57.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 99.6 Mixed 95.5 74% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.58 120% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 59%
FUJITSU MHZ2250BS G2 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 122GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.9% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 25.8 Mixed 24.7 34% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.31 64% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 36.9 MC Mixed 33.8 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	269x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	144x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16