Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	14.6 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '17 at 17:28
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 148 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 291 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 30.4 21% 28.4 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 30.9 22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1112 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 485 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 53 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5680994630	45.6% Average	Read 196 Write 182 Mixed 166 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 17.8 83% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 17.7 19% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 188GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 220 162 3983 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3977 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5017 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2208 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 212 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 43348 (C2) HDA temperature 131 103 19 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 2	43.9% Average	Read 72.8 Write 79.8 Mixed 21.7 42% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.17 81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 67%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 50GB free Firmware: GJ002J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2195 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 986 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6015 (0A) Spinup retry count 217 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5018 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 15 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 18877 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 227634053141 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 744 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 35 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4303 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 350 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	26.4% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 48.4 Mixed 16.9 27% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.31 84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 48%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 139 3991 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3264 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5951 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2688 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 288 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2975 (C2) HDA temperature 121 88 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.4% Below average	Read 60.4 Write 62.6 Mixed 23.3 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.29 92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18GB 8,131 User benchmarks, average bench 42% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 16.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	505x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	224x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	138x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16