Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '17 at 14:33
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B55 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 98.3 1-Core 36 2-Core 65.3 48% 66.5 Pts	4-Core 88 8-Core 97.9 12% 92.9 Pts	64-Core 98.5 6% 98.5 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 28 Parallax 39.1 30% 34.8 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 34 29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 114 89303421 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 134 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -747324281343 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2971 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 200 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 25 103080853632 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 89303421 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 134 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 89303421 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 89303421 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 64368 (EA) Unknown 0 0 35068 (F1) Unknown 0 0 35068 (F2) Unknown 0 0 42649	52.9% Above average	Read 279 Write 224 Mixed 218 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 12.2 88% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 97.8 DQ Mixed 12.1 24% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 81 (03) Spinup time 123 123 51580633716 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8283 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 114 114 37 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15893 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2627 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 8284 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 8284 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 219044315173 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 20	86.6% Excellent	Read 162 Write 140 Mixed 34.8 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.22 79% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 91%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 481GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 198 0 (03) Spinup time 195 193 9250 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4117 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4758 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1963 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 33 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10969 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.8% Average	Read 86 Write 87.2 Mixed 60.9 58% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.25 94% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 98%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 399GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 192 9275 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6751 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11563 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2818 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27471 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 23148 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.1% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 92.4 Mixed 76 66% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.2 70% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 48GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 13.3 Mixed 14.4 22% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.84 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 44.8 89% 44.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	570x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	210x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	61x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	106x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	85x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16