Notebook P7xxDM2(-G)

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P7xxDM2(-G) (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P7xxDM2(-G)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160902
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 404 52% 392 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 7706) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.48 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Lighting 97.2 Reflection 116 Parallax 90.2 79% 101 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 89.5 Splatting 100 78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 829GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 56 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 222070284	60.9% Good	Read 490 Write 386 Mixed 378 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 9.86 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 7.75 50% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 79.2 DQ Write 68.9 DQ Mixed 65.2 51% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 45 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 50 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 188101977	76.4% Very good	Read 498 Write 259 Mixed 299 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 18.8 118% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.7 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 18.7 52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 122%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 126GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 433 Write 196 Mixed 288 67% 306 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 2.31 36% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 138 138 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 31 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 45 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 13 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 194 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 133145034779 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	69.3% Good	Read 134 Write 107 Mixed 131 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.19 81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD2 2x8GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.6% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.6 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 18.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7xxDM2(-G) Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

System: Notebook P7xxDM2(-G)

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	26x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	45x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	29x
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	7x
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBKingstonBench 80%, 5,417 samples	5x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 2x16GBCrucialBench 75%, 442 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16