ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '17 at 11:44
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 789 77% 634 Pts	64-Core 993 62% 993 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 117 Parallax 105 93% 112 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 90.3 78% 96.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 135GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3827 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1671 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 338 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6258815041	116% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 414 Mixed 421 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 49.6 182% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 120 144% 254 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 94GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11459 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4606 (B1) Unknown 94 94 215 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1513 (EB) Unknown 99 99 875 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15105943883	83.9% Excellent	Read 512 Write 375 Mixed 450 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 24.5 105% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 99.9 DQ Mixed 74.6 87% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8024 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3231 (B1) Unknown 98 98 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 59 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 91 91 8130 (EB) Unknown 99 99 689 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11102980532	98.4% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 349 Mixed 360 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 29.7 147% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 98.6 126% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3304 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1356 (B1) Unknown 99 99 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 164 (EB) Unknown 99 99 314 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13809436090
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB 7,915 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 45GB free Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 194 3200 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14768 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20673 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8006 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1054 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14768 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2973 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.8% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 97.9 Mixed 92.2 73% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB 3,965 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 46.4 MC Mixed 40 124% 43.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 24.6 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 50.1 80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback