HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '17 at 11:17
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 42.8 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 60.7 30% 48 Pts	4-Core 70.5 8-Core 65.1 9% 67.8 Pts	64-Core 70.2 4% 70.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 3.47 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 3.04 3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 140GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 95 95 2510 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3496 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 10685 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2986 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 52 370540566 (C2) HDA temperature 71 49 487981085 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 223806 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 3 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	60.1% Good	Read 102 Write 107 Mixed 78.4 72% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.47 115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$42 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1559 (03) Spinup time 139 137 4025 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2933 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 23 23 56259 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1556 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1075 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2933 (C2) HDA temperature 106 96 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 31 31 51072 (F1) Unknown 200 200 60065303381 (F2) Unknown 200 200 49272385345	57.6% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 101 Mixed 75.3 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.39 97% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GB 619 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	97x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	81x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	34x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	205x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	37x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	16x
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GBUnknownBench 33%, 46 samples	7x
ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 505 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16