Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '17 at 21:53
Run Duration	480 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 84.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 745 73% 600 Pts	64-Core 935 58% 935 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 67 Parallax 81.6 53% 71.3 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 63 Splatting 54.9 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 467GB free Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,576 Write 533 Mixed 808 212% 972 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 24 143% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 24 34% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 144%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 290 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 546 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 21 (A3) Unknown 100 100 278 (94) Unknown 100 100 79602 (95) Unknown 100 100 1102 (96) Unknown 100 100 981 (97) Unknown 100 100 1075 (A4) Unknown 100 100 22268 (A5) Unknown 100 100 68 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 17 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 50 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 33119031853079 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 90858 (F2) Unknown 100 100 58313 (F5) Unknown 100 100 131520 (F6) Unknown 100 100 159204 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	60.6% Good	Read 492 Write 263 Mixed 276 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 12.2 80% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 44.3 DQ Mixed 12.1 16% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 91%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 750GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 619 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 67 65 10015 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2617 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14154 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2233 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11651719 (BF) G-sense error rate 98 98 24219 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 197569151000 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1803 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2779	71.1% Very good	Read 110 Write 138 Mixed 116 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.27 91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 72%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	6.64% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 7.93 Mixed 8.66 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.11 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 27% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 33%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Read 30.5 Write 3.04 Mixed 7.28 12% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.47 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 21% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 45 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 35.6 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 30.9 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)