| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds) |
| Memory | 49 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160913 |
| Uptime | 9.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 02 '17 at 21:04 |
| Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88%
Excellent
|
80% 139 Pts
|
73% 614 Pts
|
73% 1,172 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M5000
Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 377.35
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.5%
Average
|
45% 57.4 fps
|
46% 56.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
154%
Outstanding
|
176% 61.8 GB/s
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
83% 48.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 847 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 200x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 169x |
| Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 177x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 63x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 42x |
| 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples | 40x |
| 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples | 36x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $1,076 |