Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	121.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160713
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '17 at 02:32
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 371 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 150 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 668 58% 493 Pts	64-Core 1,751 108% 1,751 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6686) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.5% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 55.1 Parallax 44.8 117% 81.2 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 62.3 59% 74.6 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 449GB free Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 169 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6680 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 519 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 52 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5560 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 56 188979740701 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 338665142 (F7) Unknown 100 100 10725137 (F8) Unknown 100 100 16887557	76.9% Very good	Read 502 Write 391 Mixed 378 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 23.5 92% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 37.2 48% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 105%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,218 Write 1,428 Mixed 1,505 380% 1,717 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 33.1 131% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 52.7 56% 92 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 283%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 415GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 643 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6704 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 519 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 51 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 11290 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.8% Good	Read 133 Write 103 Mixed 128 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.28 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB 591 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 56.8 MC Write 44.5 MC Mixed 43.1 138% 48.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 16.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	56x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	52x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	43x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	15x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 122%, 173 samples	17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 95%, 1,053 samples	14x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 6,789 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $968

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)