Sony SVE15117FHW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Sony SVE15117FHW (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120911
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '17 at 03:13
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 80 2-Core 128 62% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 195 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 256GB-$29 2,279 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4162000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 456 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 150 (A5) Unknown 100 100 8674477110 (A6) Unknown 100 100 5 (A7) Unknown 100 100 19 (A8) Unknown 100 100 13 (A9) Unknown 100 100 176 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 42 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 57 63 270584512555 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3332913234696 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2498 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5194 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4751 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3145 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	53.4% Above average	Read 475 Write 253 Mixed 238 71% 322 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 7.86 55% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 7.87 25% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 99%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 308GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 22.7 Mixed 12.7 25% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB 1,622 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Sony SVE15117FHW

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)