Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '17 at 18:28
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 371 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1596 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 35.2 Parallax 44.8 31% 39.4 fps	MRender 49.3 Gravity 45.4 Splatting 36.6 35% 43.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata S510 120GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 13247563 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 85212151175080 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2544 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 25 (B1) Unknown 0 0 13 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 107376148510 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13247563 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13247563 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13247563 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 28950 (EA) Unknown 0 0 22380 (F1) Unknown 0 0 22380 (F2) Unknown 0 0 33378	34% Below average	Read 135 Write 74.8 Mixed 99.9 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 11.2 69% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 75.1 DQ Write 99 DQ Mixed 28.6 38% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 866GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 236222942 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4623 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 4370304157 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2819 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032835 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 52 437583898 (C2) HDA temperature 26 48 51539607578 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 18 236222942 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 87 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -137370233965994 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2217644847 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1882721716	67.2% Good	Read 115 Write 119 Mixed 23.9 62% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.65 137% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.79% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 6.58 Mixed 6.78 11% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.61 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.42 49% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 1x4GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 4.9 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16