Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 00:10
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 602
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 21.1
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.5
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
46GB free
Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 54.4
Mixed 38.8
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 130
Write 98.1
Mixed 4.73
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.12
24% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 104
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 0.34
144% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 20.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback