Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170519
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '17 at 08:29
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 918 83% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,318 82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 34.9 Parallax 44.1 34% 40.2 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 38.6 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16586 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1083 (B1) Unknown 97 97 49 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 293 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24910892276	85.1% Excellent	Read 516 Write 414 Mixed 419 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 20.2 118% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 96.4 77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 124%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 91GB free Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 2,007 Write 946 Mixed 1,285 311% 1,412 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 41.3 175% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 37.5 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 143 115% 154 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 230%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 74GB free Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 11496 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1379 (A5) Unknown 100 100 116002259448 (A6) Unknown 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 47 (A8) Unknown 100 100 104 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12 (AE) Unknown 100 100 824 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 56 240519610405 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 2370858123816 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2661 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5146 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4785 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6057 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	77.6% Very good	Read 476 Write 337 Mixed 325 84% 379 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 19.6 94% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 42.5 81% 165 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 814GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 193555024 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4178 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 30852098 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19918 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1034 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 8590655501 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 66 48 589430818 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 403 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 63218 (C2) HDA temperature 34 52 73014444066 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -97044786041900 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40527681554 (F2) Unknown 100 253 126803679279	99.6% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 162 Mixed 162 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.23 90% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 219GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 176 176 25782321392 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24308 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1378 (C0) Power-off retract count 61 61 47872 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 61 61 47872 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 210454642726 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.1% Good	Read 121 Write 120 Mixed 119 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.2 84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 108%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 661GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 75.8 Write 77 Mixed 80.4 101% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.28 76% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 346GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 30.7 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 39.2 SC Mixed 24.7 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16