Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '17 at 23:09
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 703 76% 604 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 37.4 34% 36.9 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 37.4 32% 39 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 56 (64) Unknown 100 100 138990 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 99 99 15 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 4 (B2) Unknown 100 100 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 153 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2487 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 0 94492098593 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C4) Reallocation count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 93 15 3758 (D4) Unknown 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 546 (F1) Unknown 100 100 206 (F2) Unknown 100 100 219 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 315840	66.8% Good	Read 504 Write 127 Mixed 204 60% 278 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 14 103% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 14.6 63% 146 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 75%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 63GB free Firmware: S8FM06.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3842 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6368 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (AA) Unknown 100 100 288 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8913091 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 56 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 12203	68.4% Good	Read 495 Write 334 Mixed 399 91% 409 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 7.48 72% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 29.6 63% 127 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 925GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896895156 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 65 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 225 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 225 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 158915231777 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 180 Mixed 176 138% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.19 93% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 1,254 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 21.2 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 32.8 SC Mixed 21.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	394x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	262x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	50x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	60x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	48x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16