Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.91% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161111
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 26 '17 at 19:32
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-7100-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
SC Int 118
SC Float 124
SC Mixed 121
97% 121 Pts
QC Int 304
QC Float 344
QC Mixed 328
74% 326 Pts
MC Int 304
MC Float 345
MC Mixed 330
49% 326 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 19
Parallax 26.6
8% 23 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 23
10% 23.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$90
177GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 413
Mixed 420
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 25.3
148% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.5
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 25.2
32% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 116%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$45
560GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 128
Write 76.5
Mixed 89.9
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.16
52% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$64
223GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 67
Mixed 59.3
50% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.17
47% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
508GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 83.4
Write 74.7
Mixed 74.2
98% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.17
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$95
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 23.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $268
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback