Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '17 at 20:16
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 782
83% 661 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 45.9
40% 47.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 1,039
Mixed 1,090
293% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 25
126% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 21.6
142% 331 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 196%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
577GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 102
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.16
68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 84%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
506GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45% Average
Read 90.4
Write 66.8
Mixed 77.2
59% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.21
45% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 86%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 1TB
80GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 71.9
Write 72.2
Mixed 70.9
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 64%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
676GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 43.9
Mixed 36.3
53% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
20GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 135
Write 69.4
Mixed 86.1
113% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.85
108% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 36%
hp v250w 16GB
13GB free, PID ae07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 5.67
Mixed 6.61
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.82
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
26% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2747 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 28.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback