Hp-pavilion RQ422AA-ABM m7750la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion RQ422AA-ABM m7750la  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek LEONITE
Memory1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 03:14
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6700-$230
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 61
38% 55 Pts
4-Core 60.8
8-Core 60.1
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 60
4% 60 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 61.9
Mixed 61.8
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.41
104% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 6.43
Mixed 9.26
15% 15 MB/s
4K Read 5.16
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.05
22% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback