| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Z170-P (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 25 '17 at 19:59 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
80% 136 Pts
|
61% 466 Pts
|
29% 469 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
18% 19.9 fps
|
17% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39.6%
Below average
|
51% 67.8 MB/s
|
86% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.1%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
59% 67.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,189 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,137x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 920x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 524x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 548x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 535x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 290x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $531 |