HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration	413 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 180 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 324 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 42.1 32% 37.7 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 4325376 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 93 (03) Spinup time 135 135 42977329652 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 81 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28802 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 79 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 207 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 207 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 257699479583 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 130 Mixed 82.1 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.44 126% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 82%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 407 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 165800703 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9281 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 406 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 673644583 (C2) HDA temperature 39 43 47244640295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 77 71 55746166 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	38% Below average	Read 67.1 Write 65.1 Mixed 43.3 44% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.32 88% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 42%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 4,486 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 9GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 4.14 Mixed 3.77 9% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 0.001 13% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 10%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 1,168 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 20.5 Mixed 15.2 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 3.95 4K Mixed 0.28 146% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB 6,584 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,668x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	545x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	238x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	123x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16