Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 13:25
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 700 68% 559 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3966) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Lighting 51.4 Reflection 48.6 Parallax 43.1 42% 47.7 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 43.9 Splatting 38.8 33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$155 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 718 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 310 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 75 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4457053756	84.8% Excellent	Read 511 Write 433 Mixed 429 102% 458 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 23.4 120% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 22.4 26% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 19GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7317 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2234 (B1) Unknown 98 98 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 17 (EB) Unknown 99 99 166 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5652081514	72.1% Very good	Read 498 Write 348 Mixed 343 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 15.7 100% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 47.4 DQ Mixed 15.5 19% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 108%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 189GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 190 185 5491 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8474 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32526 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8119 (BE) vendor-specific 49 1 51 (C2) HDA temperature 99 1 51 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.7% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 61 Mixed 56.5 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.43 111% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 32.8 Write 3.68 Mixed 6.71 13% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.95 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 22% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.3% Above average	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 22.2 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	974x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	388x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	490x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	302x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	277x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	155x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	151x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	258x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	128x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16