PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20100524 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '17 at 20:43 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.3%
Below average
|
||||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 500GB
115GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 104x |
Core i5-750Intel $75Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 96x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $484 |