Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateAug 29 '17 at 10:34
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 127
61% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 404
40% 328 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.4% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 68.4
43% 58.5 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 40.5
38% 47 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 479
Write 128
Mixed 191
58% 266 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 16.6
73% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 98.8
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 41.6
49% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
10GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71.2
Write 72
Mixed 68.8
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.43
94% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free, PID ab34
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 131
Write 139
Mixed 27.9
118% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free, PID ab36
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 25.7
126% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 18.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 13.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback