Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '17 at 21:24
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 125 48% 82.5 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 308 31% 254 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.8% Average	Lighting 43.4 Reflection 52.6 Parallax 71.2 35% 55.7 fps	MRender 55.9 Gravity 53 Splatting 74.1 51% 61 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13119 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2086 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 344 (AE) Unknown 100 100 83 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1146 (E8) Unknown 96 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1477 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16971689181 (F2) Unknown 100 100 15365121493	24.6% Poor	Read 399 Write 20 Mixed 57.8 34% 159 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 3.99 4K Mixed 4.67 25% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 56%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 176 171 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4187 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11960 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1868 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 302 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3884 (C2) HDA temperature 108 95 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.9% Very good	Read 136 Write 115 Mixed 98.6 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.27 92% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 86%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 25GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 3450 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5266 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 1 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 27379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3194 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 588382243 (C2) HDA temperature 66 57 6833948459042 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 451216 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 1 26276 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	37% Below average	Read 69.1 Write 59.4 Mixed 28.9 39% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.48 112% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 24,592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 9.7 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16