Medion Erazer P7643 MD60099

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Medion Erazer P7643 MD60099 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D17SHN
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160215
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '17 at 17:52
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	69%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 110 46% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 176 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1B0A 2286) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 13.3 15% 15.4 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 15.9 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1113 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 204 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 47 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29109109183	95% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 388 Mixed 404 95% 428 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 37.2 128% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 122 131% 220 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 131%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 492GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 190053472 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1792 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15225044 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 63896228463839 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 306 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 50 488046621 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2008 (C2) HDA temperature 29 50 64424509469 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -33195802229741 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7856537810 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10645729713 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	33.9% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 59.5 Mixed 41.7 40% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.61 105% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 126GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 206867859 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3339 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 61 44570727 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 81595788690648 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 247 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 57 454492187 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4498 (C2) HDA temperature 27 43 77309411355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17862768984944 (F1) Unknown 100 253 23707581868 (F2) Unknown 100 253 19259189695 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	42.5% Average	Read 82.9 Write 64.8 Mixed 50.7 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.53 130% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.2% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer P7643 MD60099 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Medion Erazer P7643 MD60099

CPU
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Erazer P7643 MD60099

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Medion Erazer P7643 MD60099

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)