| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150212 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 07 '17 at 10:08 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.2%
Good
|
58% 90.6 Pts
|
38% 316 Pts
|
25% 405 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
|
32.1%
Below average
|
33% 38 fps
|
31% 37.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
47.5%
Average
|
64% 293 MB/s
|
57% 20 MB/s
|
19% 26.4 MB/s
|
|
|
72.7%
Very good
|
91% 121 MB/s
|
112% 1.16 MB/s
| |
|
|
62.2%
Good
|
78% 104 MB/s
|
108% 1.14 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.2%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
58% 69 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |