PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P (all builds) |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20121018 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 07 '17 at 20:01 |
Run Duration | 2103 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.2.1
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
37.1%
Below average
|
||||
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
289GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.92%
Terrible
|
|||
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
16GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1TB
2GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 75x |
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 66x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $345 |