HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '17 at 08:43
Run Duration	882 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 94.5 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 169 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 390 46% 353 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310 4,147 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0733) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9125 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5427 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1535 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7304 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1533 (B7) Unknown 252 252 0 (B8) Unknown 252 252 0 (BA) Unknown 252 252 0 (BB) vendor-specific 252 252 0 (BC) Unknown 252 252 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 60 171799740452 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1538 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 171799740452 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0	57.4% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 100 Mixed 82.5 70% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.54 129% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 77%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB 2,112 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Read 20.1 Write 5.28 Mixed 6.8 11% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.28 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.006 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 9%
SMI USB disk 8GB 5,941 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 3.92 Mixed 5.84 10% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.07 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 15% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 2.68 Mixed 4.24 8% 8.02 MB/s	4K Read 2.73 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 10% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GB 680 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	388x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	60x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16