HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131219
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 07:17
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 188 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 501 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Dell(1028 3366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 152 Parallax 132 114% 142 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 135 Splatting 111 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 95 95 402 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24149 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 312 (B1) Unknown 87 87 450 (B3) Unknown 95 95 402 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 95 95 402 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 5962 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 5962 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 185 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16746852060	46.8% Average	Read 450 Write 74.2 Mixed 121 46% 215 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 11 67% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 53.5 53% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 116%
WD Se 4TB-$177 2,519 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 148 11225 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 142 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11309 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 117 (10) Unknown 0 200 11508358833 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 81 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 60 (C2) HDA temperature 110 105 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	91.8% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 147 Mixed 98.9 104% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.96 4K Mixed 0.3 122% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 100%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$84 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 367GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 175 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 155 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11980 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 130 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 88 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 72 (C2) HDA temperature 114 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.5% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 88.6 Mixed 64.2 60% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.25 90% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 9.57 Mixed 7.91 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.73 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 22% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA M393B1G70QH0-CMA Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C-RD M393B1G70QH0-CMA 32GB 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.6% Outstanding	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 35 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	169x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16