Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170321
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '17 at 13:05
Run Duration	314 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 198 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 635 57% 483 Pts	64-Core 863 53% 863 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 66.7 63% 73.6 fps	MRender 71.2 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 71.6 58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 52 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 24 (64) Unknown 100 100 83488 (65) Unknown 100 100 12192 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 36 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 575 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 100 163210199076 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 218 (EA) Unknown 100 100 107 (F1) Unknown 100 100 171 (F2) Unknown 100 100 128 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	55.9% Above average	Read 477 Write 253 Mixed 250 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 8.64 70% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 38.4 DQ Mixed 28.6 23% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 843GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 59 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 52 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 374 (C2) HDA temperature 112 110 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 17 (F1) Unknown 200 200 294098708 (F2) Unknown 200 200 201149368	105% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 182 Mixed 166 133% 177 MB/s	4K Read 1.29 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.35 143% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 233GB free Firmware: JP1OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5292 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20777 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4765 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6707 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6707 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 236223856671 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4354	71.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 120 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 75%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 6998 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 4.93 Mixed 7.55 11% 11 MB/s	4K Read 5.64 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.007 21% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 27.2 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 21.6 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	93x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	84x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	122x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	82x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16