Asus V-P7H55E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus V-P7H55E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V-P7H55E
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 11 '17 at 20:51
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 364
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 5215) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.88
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.13
2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Sandisk U110 32GB
0GB free
Firmware: U221000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 249
Write 94.1
Mixed 127
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 9.94
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 7.23
31% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 9.23
11% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 40%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
455GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 78.7
Write 89.8
Mixed 87.9
65% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.24
96% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
111GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 94.8
Mixed 95.1
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.32
74% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 8.67
Mixed 11.7
17% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.39
56% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 12
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V-P7H55E Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P7H55E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback