Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 21 '17 at 22:14
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
95% Outstanding
SC Int 121
SC Float 123
SC Mixed 119
97% 121 Pts
QC Int 482
QC Float 473
QC Mixed 466
107% 473 Pts
MC Int 898
MC Float 960
MC Mixed 942
140% 933 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$370
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Lighting 206
Reflection 182
Parallax 199
63% 196 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 190
Splatting 127
65% 150 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$285
23GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 437
Mixed 492
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 28.5
154% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 79.2
132% 257 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$249
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 526
Write 235
Mixed 317
79% 359 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 41.3
171% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 113
123% 213 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$330
7GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 336
Mixed 360
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 32
154% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 107
133% 238 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 100%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$162
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 2801 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 41.4
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 23.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 2,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,061
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback