Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-C R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '17 at 03:11
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 111
2-Core 196
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 593
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 36.1
29% 32.5 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 32.7
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 483
Write 142
Mixed 128
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 3.71
65% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 3.67
20% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 192
Mixed 167
141% 189 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.32
113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
271GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.59
1% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 4.59
Mixed 8.43
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.25
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.009
24% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 34.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-C R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $162
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback