| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Gateway FX6800-01e (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gateway TBGM01 |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090519 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '17 at 16:13 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 98% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.9%
Above average
|
47% 74.3 Pts
|
29% 243 Pts
|
20% 322 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0446) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.6%
Very poor
|
20% 25 fps
|
19% 22.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
35.4%
Below average
|
38% 51.7 MB/s
|
60% 0.52 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
70%
Very good
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
204% 2.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
12% 4.07 GB/s
|
46% 86.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FX6800-01e Builds (Compare 49 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Gateway FX6800-01e
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 40x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 7x |
| Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 6x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 4x |
| GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $293 |